Some conservatives who have agreed to do the show have doubtless regretted it - including George W. I drive a good car, though it's not a luxury model. "You don't have to sell out, you don't have to be one of the swells, just because you have a lot of money. Skepticism of authority - the constant suspicion that big shots are screwing the little guys - very much colors "The O'Reilly Factor." And it's why O'Reilly, married with a young daughter, still considers himself a working-class stiff, even though he has a Harvard degree and makes a reported annual salary of $4.5 million. O'Reilly says his world view has been shaped more by his early life: A lower-middle-class upbringing in a Long Island tract development, followed by a couple of years teaching in Opa-locka, Fla. "It's lazy to characterize him as being a conservative broadcaster.
Bill o reilly tip of the day tv#
"He's surprising and not as stereotypical as some people make him out to be," says Andrew Tyndall, whose newsletter The Tyndall Report monitors TV journalism.
And several religious-right organizations even called for boycotts against O'Reilly's advertisers after he ridiculed a minister campaigning against gay rights as "a religious fanatic." He's furiously bashed away at corporate America over the Enron and WorldCom scandals. He has beaten up on Jerry Falwell and Tom Selleck, among other conservative icons, and he tore into Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan: "Powerful, cold and evil." He's not the knee-jerk conservative he's often portrayed. In fact, O'Reilly's audience may be more diverse than people think.
"He's nasty and I don't agree with him," Navasky says. But he says O'Reilly's brutishness is non-ideological fun. I enjoy that." Navasky, whose magazine routinely calls President Bush a liar and demanded Donald Rumfeld's resignation as secretary of defense, seems an unlikely candidate for O'Reilly's audience. Says Victor Navasky, publisher of the left-wing magazine the Nation, "He's overbearing. What's beyond dispute is that it's the kind of video red meat that brings in viewers. Got it all? There will be a quiz.Rude? Or great showmanship? Or just a spontaneous reaction to a provocative statement? As O'Reilly would say, you folks can decide for yourselves. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. But Adams was in there with Abigail, and they were still hammering nails, the construction was still going on. It was only later on they named it the White House. In 1800, President John Adams took up residence in what was then called the Executive Mansion. If you could make it here, you could stay here. There were no illegal immigrants at that time.
Bill o reilly tip of the day free#
In addition, free Blacks, whites and immigrants also worked on the massive building.
Records show about 400 payments made to slave masters between 17. Slaves did participate in the construction of the White House. Washington was then running the country out of Philadelphia. George Washington selected the site in 1791, and as president laid the cornerstone in 1792. The history behind her remark is fascinating. He adds that others ‘helped’ too.įinally tonight, “Factor Tip of The Day.” As we mentioned, “Talking Points Memo,” Michelle Obama referenced slaves building the White House in referring to the evolution of America in a positive way. The conservative journalist says the enslaved Black people who helped build the White House were ‘well fed’ with ‘decent lodging’. In Tuesday’s edition of Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor,” host Bill O’Reilly attempts to educate his audience on the history of the construction of the White House.
0 kommentar(er)
